This ratio shows what proportion of your available marginMargin is the deposit required to open and maintain a leveraged position, acting as collateral against potential losses.Click to read more โ is currently committed across open positions.
It helps you gauge how much genuine capacity remains for new positions before approaching margin call territory.
Margin utilisation is calculated as your total used margin across all open positions divided by your total equity or available margin, expressed as a percentage. If you have R10,000 in account equity and R3,000 is committed as required margin across your open positions, your utilisation is 30%. As you open more positions, add size, or as open positions move against you (reducing equity), the utilisation ratio increases.
The calculation differs slightly from margin level, which is a related but inverse concept. Margin level expresses equity as a percentage of used margin; utilisation expresses used margin as a percentage of equity. Both measure the same relationship from different angles, and some platforms display one while others display the other or both.
This FSCA-required warning reflects the mathematical reality of leverage. A 1% move against a 1:100 leveraged position wipes the entire deposited margin.
Understanding which figure your platform displays and how it's calculated for your specific account type removes ambiguity about how close to the margin call threshold you are at any given time. The terminology varies by broker, used margin, margin utilisation, free margin, margin level, and verifying the exact calculation your platform uses is straightforward through your broker's FAQ or support.
Margin level, often the figure platforms display most prominently, is equity divided by used margin, expressed as a percentage. A 100% margin level means your equity exactly equals your required margin, you're right at the threshold. A 200% margin level means your equity is twice your required margin, indicating reasonable buffer.
Utilisation is the inverse: used margin divided by equity. A 50% utilisation means half your equity is committed as margin. A 100% utilisation means all of your equity is committed, leaving zero buffer against adverse movement.
Define maximum capital at risk per trade, typically 1-2%.
Find your stop-loss level on the chart before calculating size.
Use the instrument-specific pip value for your lot size.
Position size = (ZAR at risk) / (stop pips x pip value).
Ensure required margin fits within your available free margin.
Both convey the same information, how much of your capital is working as margin versus providing a buffer, but the framing differs. Margin level counts down toward a danger threshold at 100%; utilisation counts up toward a danger threshold at 100%. Understanding which direction your platform's figure counts in prevents misinterpreting your account status.
With a single position, margin monitoring is relatively straightforward. With multiple simultaneous positions, utilisation becomes a critical aggregate figure: each individual position's required margin may seem small, but the combined requirement can represent a significant proportion of your total equity before you're aware of the cumulative picture.
A trader with five positions, each using 15% of their equity as margin, has reached 75% utilisation across the portfolio, a level where a moderate adverse move across all positions simultaneously could trigger margin calls across multiple holdings at once. Portfolio-level utilisation monitoring makes this aggregate exposure visible in a way that position-level monitoring doesn't.
| Account | Risk % | Max loss (ZAR) | At 1:30 leverage | Notional position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R50,000 | 1% | R500 | 1:30 | R15,000 |
| R50,000 | 2% | R1,000 | 1:30 | R30,000 |
| R50,000 | 5% | R2,500 | 1:30 | R75,000 |
| R100,000 | 1% | R1,000 | 1:30 | R30,000 |
The practical risk of not monitoring aggregate utilisation is that opening a new position when already highly utilised leaves no buffer for normal adverse fluctuations on existing positions. A setup that looks attractive in isolation becomes problematic when it pushes overall utilisation into dangerous territory.
With R10,000 in account equity and R3,000 committed as required margin across open positions, margin utilisation is 30%. This means 70% of your equity remains as free margin, a comfortable buffer against adverse moves. If those same positions moved against you and your equity fell to R7,000 while required margin remained at R3,000, utilisation would rise to 43%.
Now suppose you open two more positions requiring R2,000 each in margin. Required margin rises to R7,000. With current equity of R7,000, utilisation is 100%, you're fully committed. Any further adverse move reduces equity below required margin, triggering a margin call.
Working through these scenarios with your own account figures before you're in a stressed position is more useful than learning the implications during a drawdown. Understanding precisely how utilisation responds to equity changes and additional position sizes clarifies what buffers you genuinely have.
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Account equity | R10,000 |
| Margin committed to open positions | R3,000 |
| Margin utilisation ratio | 30% |
| Capacity still available | 70% |
Many conservative traders self-impose a maximum utilisation threshold, often between 20% and 50%, and refuse to open new positions that would breach it regardless of how compelling the setup looks. This hard limit functions as a structural safeguard against the gradual over-extension that often precedes forced margin calls.
The appropriate threshold varies by trading style and risk tolerance. A position trader holding positions for weeks or months, where each position might experience substantial adverse movement without being wrong, benefits from lower utilisation than a scalper whose positions typically close the same day. The key principle is that the threshold should be set conservatively enough to survive the realistic worst-case scenario for your typical position count and holding period.
Building this threshold into your routine as a non-negotiable rule, not an aspiration, is the point where it becomes genuinely protective. A self-imposed rule that gets overridden when a good setup appears isn't a rule; it's a suggestion. The value of the threshold is precisely that it applies even when ignoring it feels tempting.
Most trading platforms display margin-related figures in the account summary section, typically visible as a footer bar at the bottom of the MetaTrader interface or as a dashboard panel in web platforms. The figures shown usually include equity, used margin, free margin, and margin level, from which utilisation can be calculated directly if it's not displayed explicitly.
MetaTrader users will find these figures in the Trade terminal at the bottom of the screen: Balance, Equity, Free Margin, and Margin. Margin utilisation can be calculated as (Margin / Equity ร 100). Some platforms display this figure directly; others require the simple division.
Worth tracking as a personal rule: establishing a maximum margin utilisation threshold you won't exceed regardless of how attractive a new setup looks. The threshold should be conservative enough to absorb a meaningful adverse move across all current positions without triggering an automatic stop-out. Setting this in advance, and treating it as firm rather than advisory, removes a discretionary decision from exactly the moment it's most likely to be made poorly.
There's no single universal figure; this depends on your own risk tolerance and trading style, though many conservative traders maintain meaningful buffer well below maximum capacity.
Yes, since this reflects your current equity and used margin, both of which change as open position values move, this ratio updates continuously rather than remaining fixed.
Some platforms offer this kind of notification functionality. Checking your specific platform's settings confirms what's available.
Generally yes, since equity typically includes unrealised profit and loss, meaning a currently profitable position can improve your overall utilisation ratio even without closing it.
Yes, this provides a useful, consolidated view of overall account risk that's particularly valuable while still building broader risk-management discipline.
Official sources: FSCA
This article draws on general information published by the South African regulators and established financial education resources listed below. Always check each source directly for the most current detail.
Explore more South African trading guides on TradeAnswers.